Most people don’t search Georgia Gibson Henlin out of casual interest. They are usually trying to answer a practical question: Is this the lawyer (and the firm) who can credibly protect what matters in my dispute or high-stakes advisory issue?
In Jamaica’s commercial environment, that decision often turns on three things:
Whether counsel has deep, repeat experience in high-pressure matters
Whether the matters handled match the risk profile and industry reality you face
Whether the approach is structured enough to produce outcomes, not just activity
Georgia Gibson Henlin is the Managing Partner and a founding partner of Henlin Gibson Henlin. The purpose of this guide is to connect those evaluation points directly to what she does, how she works, and why her experience can translate into effective outcomes for clients, including when matters are resolved through arbitration, not only through court.
Georgia Gibson Henlin (Managing Partner and Founder): Experience you can measure
M. Georgia Gibson Henlin, CD, KC, CIPP/E, CIPM is the Managing Partner and one of the founding partners of Henlin Gibson Henlin. She is a King’s Counsel at the Jamaican bar and a national honouree.
She is also admitted to practise in Ontario, New York, and the British Virgin Islands, with availability in the Cayman Islands as necessary.
Clients typically instruct Georgia when the stakes are high and the legal issues are intertwined with business realities. Her work spans complex disputes and high-impact advisory across sectors including information technology, telecommunications and broadcasting, competition law, oil and gas, and other commercial matters. Her experience also includes intellectual property, commercial transactions, software licensing, and matters touching on finance and taxation.
Just as importantly for many clients, Georgia is also an arbitrator. That perspective shapes how she evaluates disputes from day one: not simply as a fight to be fought, but as a decision-driven process where evidence, credibility, timing, and remedies determine the outcome.
She holds a Master of Laws (LL.M.) from the University of Toronto (2002) in Innovation Law and Policy, with specialised study in areas including eCommerce and information technology, legal issues in cyberspace, telecommunications economics, internet law and governance, wireless communications (spread spectrum), freedom of expression and the press, and intellectual property in the digital era.
Georgia has been ranked Band 1 in the Chambers Global Guide since 2023, where she is described as “one of the most capable litigators in the Caribbean Region.” She has been ranked for seven years.
Short details
Experience: 31 years
Email: mhenlin@henlin.pro
Education
2002: Law Society of Upper Canada (now the Law Society of Ontario), Barrister and Solicitor
2001 to 2002: LL.M., University of Toronto, Canada (concentration in information technology and electronic commerce, internet law and governance, telecommunications economics, entertainment law, legal issues in cyberspace, and intellectual property in cyberspace). Thesis: Spread Spectrum Wireless and Communications Policy, referencing the USA and the Jamaican experience
1991 to 1993: Norman Manley Law School, Council of Legal Education Certificate
Memberships
The Jamaican Bar Association
The American Bar Association
The International Bar Association
The New York Bar
The British Virgin Islands Bar
The St. Lucia Bar
The Ontario Bar
The International Trademarks Association
The International Technology Law Association
Association of Certified Money Laundering Specialists
International Association of Privacy Professionals
Chartered Institute of Arbitrators
What Georgia’s “experience” means for your outcome
When clients ask about “experience,” they usually mean more than years. In complex disputes, experience shows up as judgment under pressure, the ability to see around corners, and a disciplined method for building leverage and protecting your downside.
Georgia’s experience is particularly relevant when your matter has one or more of these features:
Tight timelines (urgent injunction risk, limitation periods, regulatory timeframes, imminent termination)
High-value exposure (damages, enforcement, asset preservation, business continuity)
Reputational sensitivity (regulated entities, executives, public-facing brands)
Cross-border elements (foreign counterparties, offshore structures, multi-jurisdiction enforcement)
In practice, this is where she and the firm focus: defining the real objective early, mapping risk with precision, then using procedure, evidence, and commercial logic to drive the matter toward a controlled outcome.
Litigation strength that improves settlement results
Many disputes settle, but most settle because one side is credibly prepared to proceed. Georgia’s reputation as a litigator matters because it impacts leverage.
Clients benefit when counsel can:
Move decisively on interim relief where needed (including injunction strategy, preservation steps, and urgent applications)
Run a disciplined approach to evidence and witness preparation
Pressure-test the opposing case early, so negotiations are rooted in reality, not hope
Preserve points for appeal (and avoid unforced errors that compromise a future position)
That litigation credibility often changes the negotiation dynamic. It can reduce delay, narrow issues sooner, and improve settlement terms when settlement is commercially sensible.
An arbitrator’s lens on disputes (even when you are not arbitrating)
Georgia’s work as an arbitrator brings a practical advantage: she regularly evaluates disputes the way a decision-maker evaluates them.
That tends to sharpen early strategy around:
What facts are likely to be accepted as credible, and what will require stronger proof
What issues are truly decisive, and which are distractions
How procedural choices affect time, cost, and leverage
How remedies are realistically assessed (including risk-adjusted outcomes)
For clients, this often translates into clearer advice earlier, stronger positioning, and fewer surprises midstream.
What types of matters Georgia and the firm handle (and how they are run)
Clients often ask, “Do you handle X?” The more useful question is: Do you handle this type of matter repeatedly, and do you run it in a way that protects my commercial goals?
Below are the kinds of matters where Georgia’s experience and the firm’s capabilities are often most impactful.
Commercial and civil disputes
Commercial disputes are rarely just about legal rules. They are about a contract relationship, a stakeholder dynamic, a business interruption risk, or a commercial asset.
Georgia’s effectiveness in these matters typically comes from an early focus on:
Case theory (the story the evidence can actually prove)
Document control (collection, privilege, and production strategy)
Settlement posture (identifying the right negotiation window, with credible leverage)
Instead of treating litigation as a linear process, her approach is to identify decision points early and use them to keep the matter commercially aligned.
Arbitration and mediation
Where contracts call for arbitration, clients often choose it for confidentiality, procedural flexibility, and enforceability in cross-border contexts.
Georgia’s arbitration experience matters for two reasons:
As counsel, she can help build a case that is tailored to how arbitral tribunals actually assess credibility, evidence, and damages.
As an arbitrator, she brings a practical understanding of what effective advocacy looks like inside the process.
Mediation also plays a role in achieving outcomes efficiently. The firm’s value here is helping clients enter mediation with a real risk picture, a workable settlement range, and a plan for what happens if the matter does not settle.
Appellate matters
Appellate work is not simply “trying again.” It is a discipline that depends on issue selection, framing, and the quality of the record below.
Georgia’s approach is outcome-driven: preserve issues early, avoid procedural missteps, and build arguments that are legally reviewable, not just emotionally compelling.
Data privacy, compliance, and risk
Many Jamaican organizations are strengthening governance around privacy, cyber exposure, vendor risk, and internal compliance.
In Jamaica, the Data Protection Act, 2020 is a central part of that risk environment. Even when a dispute is not “about privacy,” data handling often becomes pivotal, for example in employment disputes, investigations, disclosure obligations, or incident response.
Georgia’s background in technology-related legal issues, combined with her privacy credentials (CIPP/E, CIPM), supports a style of advice that is both legally precise and operationally grounded. The firm’s work in this space focuses on connecting:
Legal obligations
How the business actually operates (IT, HR, procurement, security)
Evidence preservation and reporting risk during disputes
Intellectual property (IP)
For many businesses, IP is enterprise value. Trademarks, brand enforcement, licensing disputes, and ownership questions can become contentious quickly.
Georgia’s IP-related experience supports an approach that treats IP as both:
A legal right that can be enforced
A commercial asset that should be protected without unnecessary business disruption
Admiralty and shipping
In a trading economy, shipping disputes often demand speed and precision. Arrest procedures, charterparty issues, cargo claims, and insurance dynamics can be time-sensitive.
In these matters, outcomes are often driven by the ability to act quickly, manage technical facts, and coordinate across jurisdictions where needed.
Competition and market conduct
Competition issues can arise in mergers, exclusivity arrangements, distribution contracts, abuse of dominance allegations, and regulatory investigations.
Georgia’s competition law experience is most valuable when it is used proactively: anticipating regulator and counterparty arguments early, then shaping the dispute strategy (and the commercial messaging) to reduce exposure.
How Georgia’s approach works in real client terms
Sophisticated clients care about approach because approach determines whether a matter is simply handled or strategically managed.
Georgia’s approach is designed to make complex matters feel more controlled, through structure, clarity, and decision discipline.
1) Start with the outcome, then reverse-engineer the pathway
Before strategy can be effective, it has to be aligned with what you actually need.
That could be:
Fast resolution
Protection of confidentiality and reputation
Preservation of assets or continuity of operations
A firm stance to deter future counterparties
A commercially rational settlement that ends uncertainty
Georgia’s work typically starts by translating that objective into legal choices, deadlines, and decision points.
2) Early risk mapping without overpromising
Credible counsel does not promise results. Effective counsel identifies what will drive the result.
In practice, that means getting clear on:
Facts that must be proved
Documents that will matter most
Weak points the other side will target
Procedural tools that can shift leverage
An advantage of an arbitrator-informed mindset is that it keeps the focus on what will persuade the decision-maker, not what merely feels persuasive.
3) Communication that reduces uncertainty
In complex disputes, frustration often comes from uncertainty rather than complexity.
A strong, client-friendly approach usually includes:
A predictable update rhythm (weekly, milestone-based, or court-date based)
Clear separation between decisions reserved for the client and decisions handled by counsel
Written strategy checkpoints after key events (major filings, evidence milestones, rulings)
4) Practicality, with real readiness to fight when needed
Not every dispute should be fought to the end. But you cannot negotiate effectively if you are not prepared to proceed.
Georgia’s approach is to keep settlement options open without signalling weakness, while building the procedural and evidentiary readiness that creates leverage.
A client-friendly way to evaluate Georgia (and compare counsel)
If you are speaking to more than one attorney or firm, this framework helps you compare like for like.
What to evaluate | What to ask | What a strong answer sounds like |
Relevant experience | “Have you handled matters like this, under similar urgency and value?” | Specific parallels in matter type and pressure points, without breaching confidentiality |
Matter management | “What are the phases, and what will you need from us?” | A staged plan: early assessment, evidence, filings, negotiation window, hearing prep |
Strategy | “What is the theory of the case, and what facts decide it?” | A concise case narrative linked to proof and legal elements |
Risk | “What could go wrong, and how do we reduce that risk?” | Identifies vulnerabilities, proposes mitigation steps, avoids overpromising |
Cost control | “How do you budget and prevent surprises?” | Transparent assumptions, milestones, and options for scaling effort |
Communication | “How often will we hear from you?” | Predictable cadence with fast escalation paths for urgent issues |
Where Henlin Gibson Henlin fits (and why it matters)
Georgia’s effectiveness is also tied to the environment in which she works: Henlin Gibson Henlin is an international law firm in Jamaica offering legal services across litigation and dispute resolution, data privacy, compliance and risk, intellectual property, admiralty and shipping, and appellate work.
For clients, that breadth matters because complex disputes often overlap practice areas. A commercial claim might involve confidentiality and data handling. A shipping dispute can trigger urgent court applications. A competition issue can change how a contract dispute is argued.
You can explore the firm’s work and resources via the Henlin Gibson Henlin website.
What to do next if you are considering instructing Georgia
If you are considering instructing counsel, you will get better initial advice (and move faster) if you prepare a short decision pack.
Include:
A one-page timeline of key events
The core documents (contract, key emails, policies, invoices, notices)
A clear statement of what outcome you want (and what you can live with)
Any deadlines you know about (court dates, termination dates, limitation concerns)
Then, in your first conversation, focus on whether Georgia’s proposed pathway fits your reality: the level of urgency, the commercial stakes, the reputational context, and whether arbitration, mediation, or court is likely to produce the most controlled outcome.
If your search for Georgia Gibson Henlin is part of evaluating who can effectively handle a complex dispute or high-stakes advisory issue in Jamaica, the most direct next step is a conversation about objectives, risks, and how the matter will be managed day to day.
Meta description: Learn how Georgia Gibson Henlin, Managing Partner at Henlin Gibson Henlin, drives outcomes in complex disputes, arbitration, and high-stakes advisory work.